A Russian Trade Union, a love story with Ukraine

An interesting new political strategy is happening in Eastern Europe and on the north Asian plateau and it all smells too much like strategic economics again. Russia is moving its economic weight, but this time for a new strategic move of geographic proportion, an expansion into the realm of the trade/Customs union.

The EU is not only a unity of policies, with endless bilateral agreements and an entanglement of laws. Its main function at the end, is primarily to liberalise the movement of free trade within the European countries, which we closely now refer to as member states.

The reason to join a customs/trade union are simple, export growth that can lead a much better balanced current account for a country. Germany currently being the most prosperous, and even more so since the European Monetary Union was introduced, has led the way in showing how free trade is a great source for GDP.

Russia is currently focusing on expanding its customs union to the former USSR satellite states and then maybe further onto the Eurasian plate. It wants to take advantage of its natural resource position and the export dependency a lot of the former satellite states still have on it.

Ukraine was poised and ready to become a member state of the European Union, though it all smells now like a large bluff.  At the end of it all, it comes down to your largest trading partner. Ukraine does its trade with Russia a significant amount more than with the EU. Having then a bilateral agreement between the two, would significantly reduce export/import costs. Also most Ukrainians feel more Russian than European in culture, one thing resented by many of the eastern bloc is the European unity and fear of culture loss.

 

 

  (Click to enlarge image)




 

Though behind these arguments lies the main reason. Russia has always dominated the energy supply of the eastern European sector, and Ukraine knows this too well. Vladimir Putin has also imposed heavy custom checks on Ukrainian imports creating losses in the billions in theory. Embargoes from chocolate to steel pipes were also imposed upon goods this year and Mr Putin goes further on this, with forwardly stating that the Customs union as a whole may impose high levies in order to protect the Union for EU goods possibly entering their market.

The Payoff for Russia is vast. Not only does it secure a competitive advantage of trade with the Ukraine and cuts off basically its trade relations with the EU. It further tightens its power over the former soviet state and overall makes it ever so more dependent on Russia.

Vladimir Putin is also winning powerful game with the EU over its diplomatic procedure. That in all the EUs democratic ways are rather pointless in competitive arguments, as even if the Ukraine in someways would prefer to be courting itself with the EU commission, it still has to get into bed with Moscow. But this is by far not the first major hit by Russian Bear: slowly but surely it is geographically taking back its land.

It is amazing the unfortunate though inevitable power that strategic reason can have in undemocratic environments, but it is a good example of how maybe technocratic procedures could eliminate these problems for the EU, as it battles several fronts. Banking unity, Soverigen debt restructuring, migrational issues and strategic economics.

Tata for now
G.E.

Bad US timing in Africa as Resource war is in full swing

As Obama makes his first real appearance in Africa, has he come far too late? As the president touched down in South Africa, he was greeted with more welcoming protests than the warmth he may have encountered on his trip to the G8 summit in Northern Ireland.

Africa itself is the new Jewel in the eye of slowing down major economies in the northern Hemisphere and where strategic economics may now work with African ways of life, which was unheard of back in the 80s-90s. Holding vast realms of natural resources and economies egger to grow, China has been making the most progress out of all nations, though has also been finding out, that Africa is not always easily bought and tapped.

Late jump from the gate

The Current Obama administration did not make an appearance in its last term, and through this the US has been living off the success of the Clinton administration’s duty free policy on African goods and the Bush administration’s poverty donations, though there is still nothing yet from Obama.

As he was escorted through Cape town in his usual armed battalion, including the support of the South African’s catalogue of Gorilla proof Jeeps, the president had come at a time of when millions of the continent’s inhabitants prepared for the mourning of Nelson Mandela, as well the general view of that Barak Obama “Another US President”. This comes from the Geo political position most south Africans see Mr Obama lying in. From the Libya Crisis and toppling of the Gaddafi regime last year, the involvement of more US drone aircraft in Africa and the current interactions and geopolitical moving in Syria.

Contractual ease by China

China has been conducting much more investment, as it saw the emptiness of foreign competition implementing strategy on the continent. China is finding it easy business doing deals in Africa, as a pragmatic position is taken for politics. There are no political improvements linked to any investment deal which may include a more stable government as some nations saw with previous western deals, giving much better political face to china.

Also with weak colonial might at the moment, no one is in the position to lecture China on its resource and foreign investment policies at this current time. Also with the increase of inflation in China, it is only be a matter of time until manufacturing is transferred overseas to Africa in order to reduce production costs.

Though making deals with Zimbabwe and Sudan hasn’t helped other sides of Chinese interests and shows more importance to business relationships than China’s social responsibility.

DIY Africa

The main issues with Africa are usually down to a few big factors where one or more is active:

• Political Corruption
• Civil Unrest
• Inadequate Infrastructure

The oil industry is probably the wisest of the high risks from African operations. Companies such as BP and Exxon Mobil have dealt with losing oil wells due to political tensions, such as in Somalia; workers being captured and ransomed off and the sabotage from local greed and jealousy, which is the most interesting one in my opinion.

In Nigeria a local communities jealousy over another that has a well contract from an oil firm, will usually result in pipes being cut, or well heads being set ablaze. The market for D grade black market oil is then created through tribal gangs stealing the unrefined liquid and in the meantime the environment being damaged. With Nigeria cultures you are taught not to share or help, so other communities do not work together. The only cooperative relationship that usually occurs is when cleaning companies pay gangs to destroy wells in order to get cleaning contracts.

Energy shortages are also a major issue. Known for its mass ownership of electric generators, Africa’s civil infrastructure is in desperate need of being created.

The Future

 

 

There are certain countries such as South Africa and Angola which provide a forward vision for the Continent, with maybe only one of the three issues being faced.

As the US ranks third as trading partner to the continent, it will be rather soon that more foreign direct investment moves swiftly in. This is also contributed to the the reduction in global market liquidity seen in the past weeks, on the basis of changing Central banking monetary policy (mostly from the US) and the predicted slowdown in emerging markets. Africa due to its minerals has not experienced a reduction in investment hunger so much and with still a very large gap in market capacity across the board of sectors from resource extraction to government development projects, whilst the northern boundary has the rope pulled tighter, the centre realms of the equator look promising, just how much for Africa and more so, how will the economic transition process effect Political engineering and efficiency? This issue brought up when Libya was still continuing in conflict.

 

Tata

G.E.

The tale of two Islands in Asia

We are a week into the glimpse of China's new management board, upon the stage for China, seven suits encased with red ties stood before the world.

Mr Xi Jinping is now leader of an >80m Chinese communist party with his six new team members at the helm also, however attending the congressional announcement was former president Jiang Zemin. He was there for one reason only, to reassure the world, that as much pressure china's political system is under to become democratic, it will not cease. Mr Jiang actually got more attention due to this, compared with the new president at the congressional announcement, as Mr Xi is seen to be more open in a rational sense to changes within the political system.

This would be honey to the ears of Japan, as it announces it largest trade deficit with China, and this is not due to organic economic slowdown, it is down to a bunch of islands that Japan purchased. This has now led to negative growth in nearly two quarters, ergo Japan will be declaring a recession. Though even with a slightly easier going president, that's not to say members of the old school are not present in the other six.

Going to Behavioural and Strategic impact. The US has taken a very notoriously cunning step and in some ways it will overall benefit China. The US shifted the fire-power of 40,000 troops to conduct exercises   in the area, in a mutual indication to China, that it would standby Japan to defend it's territory, as Japan and the US have a treaty on defence of each other.
However at the same time, the US will now be overtaking Japan as largest export partner to China. So throwing a few 40,000 troops in an area to keep Japan happy for a while, whilst you take over their trading position is quite a good deal.
But it is just not the US that are conducting strategic positioning  China is producing bilateral trade agreements with South Korea, so to anyone's guess, economic pressure is fully being exerted onto the sword of the samurai. In return Japan is attempting trade agreements with the EU and Australia, regardless it will loose out.
Though it's not all sunshine and butterflies for the red flowers.
China's investor arms are going into the emerging markets, as western traders start getting bullish with their Chinese weighted portfolios. They seek non domestic protection, and as much as China racks on more tax incentives and lifts investment barriers, non of this is being seen to make a world of good; only behavioural investment sense of desperation, just making traders increase their bet values against China.

So China is plotting the downfall or economic suicide of Japan with its sustainable deficit of +200% of GDP.
Though it could be worse... You could be Greece, having to deal with your politicians not agreeing with the death dealers aka IMF and the EU, which just entered negative growth also. http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/0a35504a-0615-11e1-a079-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2CnY7xTPX

Whilst you then have to watch energy companies pay fines, of larger sums that what your country so desperately needs.
http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/555fa13c-2f46-11e2-8e4b-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2CnY7xTPX

Positive economics combined with the church of monetarism and Hayek. It lacks so much irrational emotion in these scaring areas, its hard to believe this is how economies work the best!!

Tata for now... GE

The Arctic, Russia and the West

The Arctic, the final frontier and one of the most unexplored regions for oil; it has stayed very unexplored for a reason. Shell this week announced their suspension of their drilling, this included France's Total. Combined spending of these two companies within the region is estimated at approximately $7-9Bn. This has occurred due to countless safety problems and the high guarantee of not being able to contain a spill if occurred. ENI and Exxon Mobil though still have their hands hooked into the exploration of the Russian Arctic, but progress has yet to be made, or is it really Russia's Arctic?

Countless disputes between Norway and Russia over the northern territory have continued, leading more secondary companies to conduct their northern drilling explorations from Greenland, yet progress is still yet to be made, one of the suffers of $1Bn yet to make a comeback is Cairn Energy. Russia may though, as well as BP be drawing a quick line under their exploration problems, if the long battle zone of TNK-BP joint venture can be settled.Therefore rebidding of Rosneft (Russia's state oil company) can start again, bringing BP back into the Strategic oil club, and more importantly growing in size since it's asset sale to cover it's remaining Gulf of Mexico disaster repayments.

If the deal with Rosneft is completed soon, BP could quickly become the largest licensed drilling holder within the Arctic. The company is known to be at the front of hard drilling conditions, but also for their failure to operate safely. If BP through the help of Rosneft throws $12Bn give or take, with their newest Arctic technology, they could become successful in domineering the one fifth of the worlds, untapped oil resources.
The company is now finalising the selling of two refineries in the US, leaving it desperate to grow more. Taking a more primary/tertiary model of growth, will be beneficial for the company, though refining oil is turning into a more profitable area of the oil sector. Many new companies are entering this market such as Marathon Petroleum and buying refineries of the likes of BP.

If success is seen in Russia, the strategic energy chart will be weighed more heavily towards the old bears, as the unrest within North Africa and the Middle East continues. Though the slowdown in economic growth has, allowed for the demand price of oil to drop to lows of $108.00 bbl, showing that as much as oil production risk may have increased, the demand has dropped. Though I think it is safe to assume that OPEC will drop supply if it decreases "too much".

Another attack from Europe is occurring. Just before this winter the EU began a probe into GazProm (Russia's state gas company) for it's price fixing to Europe, but more on that in the next entry.
Tata GE

How to dismantle an atomic Eurozone, Putin Punches & Barrels of Black

After some weekend back pressure, Spain eventually retracted from their denial, they needed money.However... the speed in which it took, was like a bullet leaving a gun, when comparing it to the other euro-bailouts, which leaves our dear Gothic analyser in pondering. How long till the others start renegotiating their bailouts after Spain's easy cash injection?

The weakness of Europe couldn't be better portrayed this week as the value of currency continues to fall, as the markets speculate the eventual truth...The euro-zone will never be the same.

On Tuesday it was announced that the banks of Europe will now be interlinked into a european banking system infrastructure that could be complete by January next year, though that is to say that we will still be looking at the same Europe by then. The banking entwining is just an extra stepping stone in the pond towards the european fiscal union. But like so many european policies an extra stepping stone might just be delaying, the eventual splash and dampness of the ever so deep Stygian pond.

Taking a leap to Syria and we see the real site of Strategic economics and Geo-political heavyweights Russia, not leaving any breathing space and taking full advantage of gaining more political might in the middle east by the revealing of arms and now helicopter gunships support to Syria. This is nothing new for Russia to supply Syria even before the Arab spring uprising first began.

In a way it is an inevitability that Russia would do this, as it is in a current position of just turning into a fuel supplier if it were not to challenge itself to keeping the fight in its corner of the ring, plus with a troubled financial world it's the best time for Russia to do it's dirty deeds.

At the same time OPEC meets in Vienna to see what to do about the collusion oil breakers Saudi Arabia, that has continued to break its quota on oil production, though as markets predict economic slowdown. Mr Gothic economist can only say, that it could be in your interest to fill up your tank before the week is out, as Saudi Arabia will either reduce its supply; or the others will.

I had a befuddled moment of clarity, where I remember how god had created economists to make weather forecasts look good. In economics we can an only assume; and as a Gothic economist I can only assume the worst, Good day to all

P.S. Do not prithee peace, it shall not be soon!

What to do??

I had no idea what on earth to write about last week...There was too much to write about!! Instead I made a draft of my views last week which I did not finish.

So the world has turned into the rule of the bond market. If you want to know what happens, look at the rating agencies a few purpose done government leaks and the market speculation.

one day this week at 13.30 the rallying of stocks occurred on the DAX bringing it up by 3% percent within minutes. Though still peripheral pressure was implemented on Europe.

The worrying thing was that the Chinese Central Bank cut deposit rates for banks as the China markets closed negative, possibly showing a new landmine that could go off on the already fuel leaking world market.

Still I think one kind of cranky positive result that has come out this week so far is that the UK economy doesn't seem to be needing to fear the rating agencies for the time being only the Strike currently occurring which is seeing huge amounts of public Sector workers affect the growth of the UK economy.

Middle East, Democracy and Civil Unrest

If you had to think of a chess match of strategic economics, this would be it.

In chess you have to be as many steps ahead of the opponent as possible, so that the main outcome is to bait your challenger into thinking that he can see your next move. The same can be said in the real world and this could be the playing game with the middle east.

Democracy is one of the stages in the building-blocs to becoming a more advanced country, but the trick is to know when that should be done, otherwise your country could stall or even worse be at the mercy of strategic interplay whether it be economics or geo-politics.

What better way to give an excuse to allow for more foreign intervention than to allow the people in the country, to remove the autocratic government and then have the temporary elected government become corrupt. This is the case in Egypt, this week the military government took action against protesting on the main Cairo square. This resulted in deaths, showing the new Egypt as unstable, allowing for more international pressure to be put on the OPEC state.

Libya at the moment is in a good position, the current governing body seems to have a good strategy to the recovery of the country and implementing democracy in the short medium-term. Also there is an equal amount of cooperation happening in Libya between the government and public, as they give ease and criticism to the transition. Libya was also one of the most developed African countries, thus for the democracy transition, it was inevitably going to be easier. Nonetheless they still had a civil war occur and bombing with NATO (though I think this was in tern for economic aid transaction for the future).


Syria remains highly unstable and also could show a more dangerous side of strategic economics... Allow the country to internally remove itself, where the remaining controller still has a wielding power. This is cost effectiveness for any country which sees a strategic advantage whether be in implementing a new government  strategy or for fundamental resources such as geographic dominance or natural resources for the example. Also external countries have less a reason to enter Syria as it's resource return is low and the public are not that cooperative.

I will continue more tomorrow on this topic, though I just spotted an announcement on 'Moody's' rating agency, which has the French AAA credit rating under view. This is just primarily down to market speculation, as we all know whether it be fundamental behavioural theory or strategic economics, the market is always proactive, though never as rational as a monkey.
Tata